ANATOMY OF FRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA: A Search for the Pandora Box and Panacea by Prof. Emma I. Okoye Part 3
"The focal point made by the study is the need
for organisations to employ the service of Forensic Accountants as staff who
must be involved in the audit process of the organisations right from the
planning stage. As much
as the consultative expert service of a Forensic Accountant
could lead to the detection of fraud. Okoye and Gbegi (2013), believe that the
onset participation of the Forensic Accountant from the audit planning stage
will lead to the effective minimization of fraud and corruption in organisations
and the system as a whole".
4.3 Judicial Weaknesses
High profile
bribe rumours now flirts our courtrooms as justice is forcefully made to lie
low in heavy bounds in the hands of conscienceless men. Waziri (2011) stated
that, ‘Corruption seems to be the systemic disease of the Nigerian Judiciary and
has generated complaints from all segments of the society, including social
commentators, lawyers, judges, and even former President Olusegun Obasanjo’.
4.3.1 Delay in Litigation Cases
A feature of
the Nigerian judicial system is the time frame in passing a judgement on a
case. Waziri (2011) stated that although the right to a fair trial in Nigeria
is guaranteed by the Constitution, Section
36(1) of the Constitution, but ‘daily experiences appear to support the
assertion that delay is one of the major obstacles to the search for justice in
Nigeria. Hearing in a case at first instance in a Nigerian superior court can
take as long as 5–6 years with another 3–4 years consumed in appellate
proceedings’.
4.4 Legislative
Weaknesses
How can a
nation survive economic hardships when those entrusted with the checks and
balances on the actions of the Executives and their attitude to financial
decisions (the Legislature), are busy fighting for their pockets and their
selfishness at a time when the country needs their attention most? We just
recently swallowed the disgraceful quest of the Senate for 36 SUVs (Jeeps) at a
time when Nigerians were suffering untold hardship as a result of the national
fuel hike that led to a litre of fuel being sold for between N195 – N250. Their
Legislative oversight has been compromised because they are easily lobbied into
silence in neglect of their oversight function as enshrined in constitution.
4.4.1 The Shielding Effect
of the Immunity Clause
The ‘Immunity Clause’ in the
Nigerian Constitution, has also, provided a shielding effect on the activities
of State looters.
Section 308 (1) of the 1999 Constitution offers a virtual carte
blanche to the Executives to get away with anything. What it confers on them is
that they are free from criminal and civil prosecution, no matter what offence
they committed whilst in office (Waziri, 2011). This immunity clause protects
the President, the Vice President, the Governors, and the Deputy Governors
during their term of office from any of the following:
1. arrest;
2. application or issuance of Court process requiring their
appearance;
3. commencement or continuance of civil or criminal proceedings; and
4. detention/imprisonment.
Section 1(1) of the Constitution
declares that the “Constitution is supreme and its provisions have binding
force on all authorities and persons throughout the Federal Republic of
Nigeria”. I see the immunity clause as a
partial (bias) derogation from this aspect of the Supremacy Clause in that the
persons to whom the immunity is granted may be corrupt themselves or tolerate
or even promote corruption during the period of their office but due to the
immunity clause, no judicial process can be set in motion to stop them during
such periods.
Funding of Election Expenses: Section 221 of the Constitution prohibits any association or person from
funding election expenses except a registered political party. In the premises
of the foregoing, we now wonder little why the Supreme Court held that
elections are won by political parties and not individual candidates. It would then be understood that the
government in Nigeria both at the Federal and State level is run by political
parties. Whoever is the President, Vice-President, Governor, Deputy-Governor,
Member of the National Assembly or a State House of Assembly is there to
execute the will of the political party that sponsored him and funded his election
expenses. Surely, he who pays the piper
dictates the tune and for a country like Nigeria, this is a room for corruption
because most times the political party that sponsored a candidate to an
elective position will press him/her to refund the party the fund expended at
the election.
4.4.2 Overbearing Function
of the Executive
The Constitution provides for the
appointment of the Auditor General, Accountant General, and the CEO of the
Security Printing, Minting Commission (SPMC) and CBN Governor by the
Presidency. This function might provide a medium for manipulation and abuse, as
due process might not be observed in such appointments and the appointees turn
out loyal to the Presidency.
4.5 Corporate Governance Lapses
In Nigeria, the Central Bank of Nigeria [CBN] in its Report (2006)
stated that “poor corporate governance amongst other things was identified as
one of the major factors in virtually all known instances of a financial
institution’s distress in the country”. The calibre of people found on the Board
of most banks may not necessarily be of proven integrity and as a matter of
fact they are often not independent of the Chairman or any other Director who
may turn them to mere rubber stamp (Adedipe, 2004). Appointments into Board positions
are usually done based on political affiliations, relationship with the owners,
etc. rather than expertise or ability to meaningfully contribute to the growth
and development of the corporation.
4.5.1 Inadequacy of the Traditional Audits
With the
evolving landscape of fraud in the country, the traditional audits are
increasingly losing relevance especially were the perpetrators of large scale
schemes are professionals with a knowledge of financial expertise. The failed corporations
in the US, e.g. Enron, WorldCom, etc., and Cadbury, Oceanic Bank, in Nigeria
all had External Auditors in place who were expected to provide independent
assurance on the ‘true and fair’ nature
of the financial statements.
Moreover,
the nature of appointments and the duration of the appointment have also
constituted a flaw in the performance of their duties. Most firms rely on a
continued basis of appointment as a source of revenue, while the length of
client-Auditor engagement impairs the independence of the Auditors, as most
usually engage in other services for the client for which they are paid for.
4.5.2 Financial Reporting Weaknesses
Professional
Accountants in most organisations, fail to comply with the ethical requirements
of their profession. A clear case is the role the Finance Director of Cadbury Nig.
Plc. played in the scam that rocked the company some years back. At times Accountants
collude with the management in changing principles and policies over time with
a view to manipulate the figures.
The previous
accounting regulatory framework in the country is also not tilted towards high
quality disclosure, most times information of a qualitative nature are
neglected, and not displayed in financial reports. Some of the quoted companies
seem not to have functional websites were the public can track and download
annual and interim reports of performance over a period of time.
4.6 Religious Hypocrisy
Religion is
capable of affecting the beliefs of a group of people, however, there seems to
be a disregard of the purported teachings of the church, as individuals who perpetrate
fraud also profess to be Christians.
It therefore
calls to mind, the fact that ‘people do
not practice what is being taught’, moreover the overwhelming influence of
politics on most churches, has also diluted the fundamental tenets of the
church, questioning whether it’s really purpose for Christ or for accolades by
politicians.
5.1 The Panacea
The dismal
discourse is that the country's traumatic experience is yet to ease up fifty
years after the attainment of political freedom. The crucial question then
becomes, what can be done to stem this seemingly increasing trend of fraud and
corruption in the country? A prominent scholar, Soyinka, described corruption as
the unifying factor in Nigerian governance. A holistic approach will therefore
require a joint responsibility among the three arms of government – the
Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary – in tackling the menace and
promoting governance. A clear biblical exposition of 1 Corinthians 12:12-31,
of the relatedness of all parts to the greater good of all.
5.2 Executive Measures
A stream of
measures to be adopted by the Executive arm of Government to tackle fraud and
corruption in the country and ensure macro-economic stability in the country.
5.2.1 A Subservient Democratic Process
The challenges
that face Nigeria as a nation cannot be met without a credible and competent
leadership. A credible and competent leadership cannot emerge through an
electoral process riddled with corruption and violence (Idada &
Uhunmwuangho, 2012), therefore a necessary first step in tackling fraud and
corruption in the country is to re-examine ways in which political leaders are elected
and or appointed. This can be achieved by democratizing the election process,
ensuring the real and absolute independence of the INEC, and the police to
safeguard life and property during the process. A case of defeat should be
accepted whole heartedly without prejudice
5.2.2 Proper Monitoring of the Implementation of
Treasury Single Account[TSA]
Previously, successive governments in the
country operated multiple accounts for the collection and spending of
government revenue which was in disregard to the provision of the 1999
Constitution requiring that all government revenue be remitted into a single
account. Specifically, Section 80 (1) of the 1999 Constitution as amended
states:
“All revenues, or other moneys
raised or received by the Federation (not being revenues or other moneys
payable under this Constitution or any Act of the National Assembly into any
other public fund of the Federation established for a specific purpose) shall
be paid into and form one Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation”.
A question bothering
most Nigerians therefore is; has the TSA really achieved the purpose for its
implementation?
Another
crucial question in the implementation of TSA, is the adequacy of Government
monitoring mechanisms on the system? To this, we argue that the level of
monitoring of the Treasury Single Account should be strengthened as to ensure total
compliance.
5.2.3 Independence of Anti-Graft Agencies
Both the
ICPC and EFCC were charged with the responsibility of implementing Nigeria’s
numerous anti-corruption legislations. In order to boost their performance,
these agencies first need to be independent of the Executive arm of Government,
who might use them to achieves selfish objectives. The anti-graft agencies
would then need to rise up and stand upon the statutory independence granted to
them so that they can perform their statutory duty without fear or favour and
not at the whims and caprices of the President or Governor or the ruling
Political Party.
Also, is the evaluation of their performance
using carefully designed set of quantitative indicators (statistical data and
measures of public perceptions) and qualitative indicators (expert assessment
and surveys) based on the functions that the institution carries out and not
necessarily on the deceptive false performance stories rolled out daily by the
government on our national dailies and newspapers with pending results that are
rarely attained.
5.3 The
Relevance of Forensic Accountants
Okoye and Akamobi (2009) posit that forensic
accounting as a profession remained unknown until the plethora of high-profile
scandals, stricter reporting and internal control regulations which brought to
light its importance to the business world. Forensic accounting is the
tripartite practice of utilizing accounting, auditing and investigative skills
to assist in legal matters (Modugu & Anyaduba, 2013). It is a specialized
field of accounting that describes engagements that result from actual or
anticipated disputes or litigation. Forensic accounting can, therefore, be seen
as an aspect of accounting that is suitable for legal review and offering the
highest level of assurance (Apostolou, Hassell, & Webber, 2000). According
to Okoye and Akenbor (2009a) forensic accounting covers two broad areas of
practice, these are: litigation support and investigative accounting.
In a series
of well documented cases, Forensic Accountants have proved to be of great
relevance to the Nigerian economy. Two outstanding cases were NNPC $20b USD
unremitted amount to Federation account in 2014 and NSE 2010 investigation as a
result of whistle blowing unveiled billions of stolen money.
The study
undertaken by Okoye and Gbegi (2013), entitled ‘An Evaluation of Forensic
Accountants to Planning Management Fraud Risk Detection Procedures’, evaluated
the extent the involvement of forensic accountants during the audit planning
stage effectively modifies the extent and nature of audit test when the risk of
management fraud is high and whether forensic accountants can adequately
propose unique procedures that are not proposed by auditors when the risk of
management fraud is high. The study compared the findings with the results of a
previous study done by Asare and Wright (2004), employing Multivariate Analysis
of Variance (MANOVA) and One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for comparison.
Table 5.1: Comparison of Risk
Assessment (No Risk Assessment Fraud Check List Provided) against Asare and
Wright (2004)
Type of Risk and Test Value
|
T
|
Df
|
p-value
|
Mean Difference
|
Inherent Risk (IR): 5.47
|
0.968
|
15
|
0.349
|
0.530
|
Control Risk (CR): 3.64
|
2.299
|
15
|
0.036
|
1.173
|
Fraud Risk (FR): 4.67
|
5.297
|
15
|
0.000
|
2.080
|
Source:
Field Survey (2011)
The study
found that Forensic Accountants Inherent
Risk judgment were indistinguishable from those of auditors used in the Study
by Asare & Wright’s (2004). However, their Control Risk and Management Fraud
Risk assessments were higher than those of auditors. Consequently, for the organisation to maximise the effectiveness of the
Control Risk and Managerial Fraud Risk assessment, the Forensic Accountant must
be on ground as a staff of the organisation, and not as a consultant or an
appointed Forensic Auditor.
Table 5.3: Fraud Risk Factors
Based on Asare and Wright (2004) Checklist
Management's characteristics
and influence over the control environment:
|
Yes (n, %)
|
No (n, %)
|
Is a significant portion of management's compensation
represented by bonuses, stock options, or other incentives, the value of
which is contingent upon the entity achieving unduly aggressive targets for operating
results, financial position, or cash flow?
|
15 (93.8%)
|
1 (6.3%)
|
Is there any excessive interest by management in maintaining or
increasing the entity’s stock price or earning trend through the use of
unusually aggressive accounting practices?
|
10 (62.5%)
|
6 (37.5%)
|
Is there a practice by management of committing to analysts,
creditors, and other third parties to achieve what appear to be unduly
aggressive or clearly unrealistic forecasts?
|
10 (62.5%)
|
6 (37.5%)
|
Does management have an ineffective means of communicating and
supporting the entity’s values or ethics, or communication of inappropriate
values or ethics?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Is management dominated by a single person or small group
without compensating controls such as effective oversight by the Board of Directors
or Audit committee?
|
3 (21.4%)
|
11 (78.6%)
|
Does management fail to correct known reportable conditions on a
timely basis?
|
9 (56.3%)
|
7 (43.8%)
|
Does management set unduly aggressive financial targets and
expectations for operating personnel?
|
1
(6.3%)
|
15 (93.8%)
|
Does management display a significant disregard for regulatory
authorities?
|
9 (56.3%)
|
7 (43.8%)
|
Does management continue to employ an ineffective accounting,
information technology, or internal audit staff?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Has there been a high turnover of senior management, counsel, or
board members?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Are there frequent disputes with the current or predecessor
auditor on accounting, auditing, or reporting matters?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Is there any known history of securities law violations or
claims against the entity or its senior management alleging fraud or
violations of securities laws?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Risk factors relating to
industry conditions:
|
Yes (n, %)
|
No (n, %)
|
Is there a high declining of competition or market saturation
accompanied by declining margins?
|
15 (93.8%)
|
1 (6.3%)
|
Is the industry declining with increasing business failures and
significant declines in customers’ demands?
|
12 (75%)
|
4 (25%)
|
Risk factors relating to
operating characteristics and financial stability
|
Yes (n, %)
|
No (n, %)
|
Is the client unable to generate cash flow from operations while
reporting earnings and earnings growth?
|
3 (18.8%)
|
13 (81.3%)
|
Are there significant pressures to obtain additional capital
necessary to stay competitive considering the financial position of the
entity-including need for funds to finance major research and development or
capital expenditures?
|
9 (56.3%)
|
7 (43.8%)
|
Are assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenses based on
significant estimates that involve unusually subjective judgment or
uncertainties, or that are subject to potential significant change in the
near term in a manner that may have a financially disruptive effect on the
entity-such as ultimate collectability of receivables, timing of revenue
recognition, realizability of financial instruments based on the highly
subjective valuation of collateral or difficulty-to-assess repayment sources,
or significant deferral of costs?
|
11 (68.8%)
|
5 (31.3%)
|
Are there significant, unusual, or highly complex transactions,
especially those close to year-end, that pose difficult “substance over form”
questions?
|
15 (93.8%)
|
1 (6.3%)
|
Are there difficulties in determining the organization or
individual(s) that control(s) the entity?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Has the company experienced an unusually rapid growth or
profitability especially compared with that of other companies in the same
industry?
|
5 (31.3%)
|
11 (68.8%)
|
Is the company vulnerable to changes in interest rates?
|
8 (50%)
|
8 (50%)
|
Does the company have an unrealistically aggressive sales or
profitability incentive program?
|
11 (68.8%)
|
5 (31.3%)
|
Is there a threat of imminent bankruptcy or foreclosure, or
hostile takeover?
|
0 (0%)
|
16 (100%)
|
Is there a poor or deteriorating financial position when management
has personally guaranteed significant debts of the entity?
|
1 (6.3%)
|
16 (93.8%)
|
Source:
Field Survey (2011)
To examine
whether Forensic Accountants propose unique procedures that are not proposed by
auditors when the risk of Management Fraud is high, two independent forensic
accountants reviewed the subjects’ response to the audit procedures, and, also
identified a significant number of additional procedures not contained in the
study by Asare and Wright (2004).
Table 5.4: Description of
Additional Procedures Proposed by Forensic Accountants
S/No
|
Description of Risk
|
Procedure
|
1
|
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue are recognized by precision before they are ended (Fraud
specialist referred to this risk by such labels as “Channel Stuffing”, “Bill
and Hold”)
|
Sales to distributors and not sold on to the end user should be
measured against the revenue recognition criteria. Abnormal finance terms are
indicators of non-compliance with GAAP.
Perform the following on sample of distributors:
Obtain the contract;
Ascertain whether the 4 revenue recognition criteria are met;
and
Determine whether precision assisted the customer in obtaining
financing or provided direct financing for the sale.
|
2
|
Precision in shipping goods in excess of what distributors have
committed to and/or have the capacity to sell.
|
Select key item sample of distributors for confirmation of
inventory on hand and amount receivable by Precision. Contact any non-replies
by phone directly to enquire of status of account (in the circumstances
shipment records or subsequent payments may be inappropriate and questionable
value). Make enquiry of 4 distributors regarding their allotment minima.
Request and review schedule of allotments of product that must have been
prepared by the company and probably revised several times.
|
|
Channel stuffing
|
Review the terms under which precision ships goods to customers
to ensure they are based on a purchase contract and that no channel stuffing
has occurred
|
3
|
Analog sales/purchases
|
Analyze monthly analog sales and order trends of for company and
industry.
Assess impact of programme on historical purchases by each of
the known customers.
If end users would be increasing analog purchases to an
implausible level, assessment of the consequences of the distributors were
still having significant quantities on hand. Ultimately, if end users cannot
absorb the equipment what happens? (e.g. bad debts, damage to distribution
chain or does precision step into rescue distributors and or provide
additional incentives for the end users).
|
4
|
Consignment
|
Ensure no consignment type arrangement exist especially for
customers who don’t have warehouse capacity.
|
5
|
Customers verification
|
Obtain listing of customers who have been distributed funds by
precision. Investigate any distributors and sales that are comfortable in
limiting or amount. Obtain supporting documentation to understand the nature
of the distribution as well as whether all revenue recognition have been met.
|
6
|
Precision recognizes revenue upon shipment. If they ship to
warehouse, but customer does not have the need/capacity for such goods, the
company may be improperly recognizing revenue, when all required criteria for
recognizing have not been met.
|
Assess ownership of good in offsite storage
Has legal title passed?
Who owns offsite storage?
Who is responsible for rent?
Who pays insurance (many)?
|
7
|
Confirmation with distributors
|
Confirm with distributors all amounts;
Removed from precision’s inventories but not delivered to
distributors; and held at warehouse or under accommodations to ensure they
meet the requirements for revenue recognition according to GAAP. Tie these
amounts into sales contracts.
|
8
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Provision for bad debts is not adequate
|
Obtain download of customers list. Run customer list against
credit rating agency database. Focus particularly on sales near period end.
Examine supporting documentation to ascertain whether amounts were collectible
at point of revenue recognition.
|
9
|
Account receivables and doubtful account
|
Assess the reasonableness of accounts receivable collection and
allowance for doubtful accounts. (Although credit has been extended, it is
uncertain on what basis credit history would support collectability since
credit history reflects past, but customers already acknowledge difficulty in
paying for new management initiative. Uncertain if they can sell analog if
precision is already experiencing difficulty selling).
|
10
|
Analog sales on precision estimate
|
Obtain analog sales data for distributors participating in the
marketing programme. Compare distributors’ sales to third parties to
distributor’s analog purchase from precision. Determine if distributors are
on track for selling 30% (based on precision estimate) of their inventory
when their promissory notes are due to precision.
|
11
|
Right to return
Distributors will ship back product prior to or on June 2006
|
Review the terms under which precision will accept return of
their goods.
|
12
|
Historical rates of returns
|
Analyse and assess the historic rates
of returns for participation in marketing programmes and actual returns
during field work period to determine if provision needed and if so the
adequacy of management’s position
|
13
|
Understated Expenses
Precision has not recorded all the expenses associated with the
programme. As this is a new programme management; judgment will be used to
determine expenses
|
Review the documentation prepared by
precision to estimate the effects of the new marketing programme. Identify
costs factored into the analysis of the programme and what costs have been
omitted (if any). Examine and recalculate company’s estimate of costs and
revenue contra amounts and those actually accrued (if any)
|
14
|
Motivation for programme.
The establishment of the marketing programme was motivated by
management compensation plan rather than sound business rational and
therefore reflects a conflict of interest.
|
Determine the impact of the marketing
programme in management compensation by comparing the year’s bonus to top
management (by employee) to prior year’s to see how much individuals are
benefitting from marketing programme.
|
Source: Field Survey (2011)
The focal point made by the study is the need
for organisations to employ the service of Forensic Accountants as staff who
must be involved in the audit process of the organisations right from the
planning stage. As much as the consultative expert service of a Forensic Accountant
could lead to the detection of fraud. Okoye and Gbegi (2013), believe that the
onset participation of the Forensic Accountant from the audit planning stage
will lead to the effective minimization of fraud and corruption in organisations
and the system as a whole.
The results
suggest that the consultative involvement of Forensic Accountants whereby the
audit team provides them with a summary risk assessment, might not yield
significant results as when the Forensic Accountants actively participate
during planning stage of the audit.
A 2016 research carried out by
ACFE corroborated the above views of Okoye and Gbegi (2013), stressing that:
“organisations
with CFEs (Forensic Accountants) on staff uncover fraud 50 percent sooner and
have losses 55 percemt lower”
ANATOMY OF FRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA: A Search for the Pandora Box and Panacea by Prof. Emma I. Okoye Part 3
Reviewed by Awareness
on
Thursday, October 20, 2016
Rating:
No comments: