Confusion in Abia over guber election as Ozekhome says Court of Appeal judgment ‘fundamentally flawed’

A human rights activist and constitutional lawyer, Mr. Mike Ozekhome, has described the Court of Appeal judgment on the Abia State Election Petition Appeal as, ‘fundamentally wrong’ and full of errors in law.
Mr. Ozekhome, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who was speaking at a Channels TV Breakfast programme Sunrise Daily yesterday pointed out that the Court of Appeal was wrong in nullifying the election of Abia State governor, Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu and declaring the candidate of the All Progressives Grand Alliance, Mr. Alex Otti as the winner of the election.
The constitutional lawyer noted that the Court of Appeal erred in law by granting the appeal of Mr. Otti who could not adopt his own written statement on oath at the Tribunal and also by admitting in evidence, the Card Reader Report from a witness who was not the maker of the document.
He also wondered how the Court of Appeal could give credence to the evidence of the APGA star witness, Mr. Ahamdi Nweke, who was only a collation centre agent and could not have been at the polling units where elections were alleged not to have held.
The Senior Advocate reasoned that, on the facts of the case before the Court of Appeal, it was fundamentally wrong for them to have declared Mr. Alex Otti as the winner of the elections and ordered his swearing-in.
He noted that considering the fact that even going by the calculations of the Appeal Court justices, the difference between the votes allocated to Otti and Ikpeazu was 48,000 while the total number of registered voters in the three local government areas of Obingwa, Osisioma and Isialangwa North, where they cancelled the elections are over 250,000 and as such, going by the Electoral Act, the very worst the Court of Appeal should have ordered a re-run election in those three local government areas, where they cancelled elections to decide the eventual winner.
He equally faulted the Court of Appeal for relying only on the Card Reader to determine the issue of over-voting and wondered why they discountenanced the manual accreditation done in those local government areas considering the fact that the INEC Guidelines allowed for manual accreditation, where Card Readers fail.
Ozekhome expressed the confidence that the Supreme Court will not allow the Appeal Court judgment on Abia State governorship election to stand in the interest of equity, justice and fairness.

Confusion in Abia over guber election as Ozekhome says Court of Appeal judgment ‘fundamentally flawed’ Confusion in Abia over guber election as Ozekhome says Court of Appeal judgment ‘fundamentally flawed’  Reviewed by Unknown on Saturday, January 09, 2016 Rating: 5

No comments: