GLOBALLY speaking, Subsidy in its true sense is a welcome
idea.
In fact, it is
defined in economics as money paid by government or an organisation to reduce
the cost of producing goods so that their prices can be kept low. It seeks to
reduce the market price of an item below the cost of production. Government
intervenes to support desirable activities to keep the prices of staple low;
maintain the income of producers of critical or strategic products; induce
investment while reducing unemployment.
Everywhere, subsidy
is supposed to be a cushion to enhance the welfare and well-being of the
people. It is an acceptable practice the world-over.
For example, during
winter in Germany in the mid 80s, it was a common phenomenon that when the
price of oil increased astronomically because of some major adjustments by
OPEC. Many companies would have just gone under but government quickly
intervened with a serious subsidy package. Among other things, industry workers
who were 'pulling gburu' were made to work two days a week (eight days a month)
for full month's pay. That is subsidy.
If all American
farmers were to be allowed to produce at their optimum levels, food would be
surplus and totally useless everywhere. The American government has had the
practice over the years of paying some selected farmers to stay at home, not
producing anything during the year. That is subsidy.
In these places, the
subsidy scheme is well managed and it gets to the target population – the poor.
But in Nigeria, the exact opposite is the case: the real beneficiaries are not
the poor but the middlemen and the rent seekers, contrary to the argument
usually advanced and which has been at the heart of subsidy's continuation,
that it is pro-poor.
The subsidy regime
in Nigeria reminds us of two issues – first, subsidy would have been absolutely
unnecessary if we were doing our own refining in Nigeria. Secondly, the subsidy
regime has been fraught with fraud and dishonesty.
Between 2006 and
2014, Nigeria paid over N7.5 trillion as subsidy claims. Yet, we are still
where we are – the subsidised products are not available and where they are
available, they sell for prices much higher than the unsubsidised products. Put
differently, we have been subsidizing fraud because we have found it
ridiculously impossible to monitor the oil markets who have made fools of our
managers of the economy.
Oil subsidy: a welcome idea?
Reviewed by Vita Ioanes
on
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Rating:
Reviewed by Vita Ioanes
on
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Rating:


No comments: