www.odogwublog.com
brings you exclusive the speech of Gen. Yakubu Gowon during the convocation
lecture of Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University (Formerly Anambra State
University), Uli. Prof Fidelis Okafor, the Vice Chancellor brought him.......see below
No Victor, No Vanquished: Healing the
Nigerian Nation; being the text of the convocation lecture delivered by his
Excellency, Gen. Yakubu Gown, Gcfr; Former Head of State
&Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
at Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University (Formerly Anambra State University),
Uli, Igbariam Campus.
Protocols
1.
I
was pleasantly surprised when I received the invitation from the
Vice-Chancellor, Prof. Fidelis Uzochukwu Okafor, to be here today to deliver
the first Convocation Lecture of this institution after its name change from
Anambra State University to Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, Uli, Igbariam Campus.
My first reaction, as a trained officer and a General in the Armed Forces of
the federal Republic of Nigeria, was to suspect a booby trap, especially
against the backdrop of what a host of individuals would consider as my
‘special’ (some might even erroneously say, ‘fractious’) relationship, first,
with the Eastern Region/South East Nigeria but, more importantly, with the Late
Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, Eze Ndi
Igbo Gburu Gburu (Leader of Igbo everywhere), an officer and gentleman in whose
honour this institution has been renamed. I would like to state categorically
from the onset, it was never out of hatred for the Igbos (Ndigbos) or animosity
against my old Comrade and colleague; Emeka, but on principle of commitment to
ONE NIGERIA.
2.
When
I speak of a ‘booby trap’, I refer to the possibility that some brilliant
Professors in the Convocation Planning Committee may have deemed this a good
time and platform to get me make an early ‘public presentation’ of my memoirs
by other means. I reckoned that the organisers may easily have been persuaded
to believe that it would be near-impossible for me to do justice to the
subject-No Victor, No Vanquished: Healing the Nigerian Nation-without
sharing critical insights into my story vis-Ã -vis the history of Nigeria,
especially in respect of my role in the 30-month Civil War that gave rise to
the first part of the topic of this lecture.
3.
In
this regard, let me begin by quickly dousing speculations that my late brother
and friend, the Ikemba of Nnewi and I probably continued our ‘fight’ until his
death in the UK on November 26, 2011. We achieved reconciliation several decades,
about four decades ago when we had our four
(4) decades ago when we had our first post-civil warphysical meeting in the
late 1970’s in his room at the Mont Calm Hotel, Marble Arch in London. Before
then, he had reached out to me through his friend, Fredrick Forsythe who rang
the house and spoke to my wife, for him. He then, spoke to her and later
informed me at Warwick University where I was pursuing my graduate/postgraduate
degree programme at the time. When, I was back home at the weekend, I called
him and arrangedto meet. We eventually met at the Month Calm Hotel, Mrable
Arch, London. I recall that our first meeting. Our meeting was a spontaneous
first name call by both of us-Emeka! Jack! Nice meeting you again. We shook
hands and embraced each other warmly and engaged in heart to heart discussion,
reminiscing on the past and expressing hope that we could soon returns and join
forces with our compatriots back home to build a better Nigeria. He soon did
joining the political foray and followed later after completing my studies.
Many waters have passed under the bridge thereafter, some of which I may have
reason to recall in the course of this lecture.
4.
I
readily accepted the invitation to be here for a number of reasons. First,
because it presents a good opportunity for me to personally thank the
government and people of Anambra State as well as the Governing Council,
Senate, Staff and students of the former Anambra State University for the
posthumous honour that was bestowed on my late comrade in arms with the name
change. I wholeheartedly endorse this gesture, especially in light of the
uproar that a similar exercise on behalf of another notable Nigerian generated
in one of the nation’s tertiary institutions a few years back. In addition, I
see the raison d’être for this lecture as being in tandem with my worldview on
the need for consistent reinforcement of knowledge to stem the spread of
ignorance and deliberate mis-education of our bright young men and women. I
also accepted the invitation because of my abiding faith in the present and the
future of our great nation, Nigeria. Yet on a personal note, it is not
difficult to admit that an invitation to once more visit Uli was hard to
decline. One needed to again step foot on the town that symbolized the
inventiveness of our brothers and sisters, the Igbo people, from the East. Uli
was the hub of aviation activities activities in war time Eastern Nigeria and
one could only wonder what the horizon would have been had successive
governments after my regime followed our blueprint for the development of
Nigeria, as encapsulated in the abandoned Third National Development Plan,
1975-1980.
5. Looking
back, it is not difficult to see that we spent a significant part of the
nation’s past to chart a course to greatness. We spent another chunk of our
history building and defending a united nation. The rest of the time we have
spent moving from one political or economic crisis and experiment at nationhood
to another. Today, we are on the threshold of history as we take one more step
at strengthening democracy and safeguarding the future of Nigeria and her
nationals. We need all hands on deck to make this experiment work for the
greater good of our nation and for the sake of Nigerians yet unborn.
6. Distinguished
ladies and gentlemen, I have had to do this detailed preamble to demonstrate
that I consider it an honour to be here with you today. I also warmly and
sincerely welcome you all to this Convocation lecture, which is a tradition
forum for the cross fertilization of ideas in the academia worldwide. At the
risk of preaching to the converted, let me restate that convocations are
important for the simple reason that the ceremony celebrates an end as well as
a beginning. An ‘end’ because it signifies the formal cessation of classroom
teachings for fresh graduates and a ‘beginning’ because it opens a completely
new vista for them. I am confident that the Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu
University has made a success of expanding the worldview of its young graduates
as well as suitable equipping them to face the challenge of living in a tough
world that never fails to punish laziness or reward hard or smart work.
Anything to the contrary will defeat the purpose of our celebrating academic
excellence.
7. The
topic of today’s lecture caused me to quickly reflect on what I said late last
year at a gathering similar to this. Permit me to quote from my address at the
occasion:
“The management
of education in Nigeria today requires all citizens to contribute their quota
so that we can have minds that are not only literate but could more maturely
grasp the issues that define contemporary reality. One of such realities
concerns democracy. One fact that many people may not immediately grasp is that
without democracy, economic development can hardly be achieved because a host
of the needed support structures, such as education, would be hinged on very
weak foundation. If democracy must work, our peole must be more than willing to
explore possibilities beyond their immediate environment because peace, trust
and unity can only exist where people are receptive to new ideas regardless of
the political, religious or economic creed of the sponsors of such ideas”.
8.
I
have recalled this because of its relevance to today’s discourse. Let’s not
forget that I have started out speaking about the ‘redemption of ignorance’ and
probably mis-education of our youth. I say this because we cannot meaningfully discuss
the concept of ‘No Victor, No Vanquished’ and its import for healing our nation
without being properly and historically guided to understand where we are
coming from and where we are headed. For this reason, I have elected to
structure this short lecture into four easy-to-follow parts, namely:
a.
Nigeria
before the Civil War
b.
Nigeria
during the Civil War
c.
Nigeria
immediately after the Civil War, and
d.
Nigeria in a democratic dispensation
NIGERIA BEFORE
THE CIVIL WAR:
9.
Our
various publications and history books are replete with explanations and
clarifications of the way we were before the amalgamation of Nigeria in 1914.
Evidence abound of the milestones attained and the shards of broken dreams that
littered the road that we travelled to achieve independence in 1960. If we
diligently search the several pages of our history between October 1, 1960 and
July 6, 1967, when the Civil War broke out, we will find enough lessons on what
we did right or did wrong and adapt these for current and future use to avoid
failing into the errors of the past. In all this, a number of issues stare us
in the face. First, is the fact that as a people, we have abiding faith in God
and ourselves and, to that extent, are always willing to be our brothers
keepers regardless of religious, political, economic, social and cultural
differences. Secondly, as we advanced fear crept in surreptitiously and before
we knew what was happening, we had become suspicious of another so much so that
shouts of ethnic domination became the whip with which the leadership of the
political class kept compatriots in different regions of the country in line.
All manner of evil was perpetrated in the name of advancing narrow regional
interests. Corruption, nepotism, treachery and threats or accusations treason
became rife. The cord that hitherto bound us snapped and as far as any
discerning person could see, it was only a matter of time before the ship of
the Nigerian State grounded.
10.
In
all of this time, the military was the bulwark for the protection of democracy
and freshly won independence. In no time, however, even the Military became
politicized and polarized. Espirit de corps withered in the face of transient
power. Yet some of us held firmly to the tradition of the military to continue
to support civil authority, until some of our younger officers not could
control themselves and launched the first of a series of military incursions or
interventions into political Nigeria with the first of d’état on 15 January
1966. The nation never recovered from the onslaught and the recriminations that
set in thereafter and only subsided with the re-enthronement of democracy in
the Fourth Republic on May 29, 1999. The wounds, however, are yet to fully heal.
NIGERIA DURING THE CIVIL WAR:
11.
The
history of Nigeria’s Civil War is fairly familiar to everyone. But several grey
areas still exist regarding the cause and course of the war. I have read several
accounts of the War with some degree of amusement but often times with critical
concern. The more I read of these stories, the more I am convinced that the
writing of our history must never be left in the hands of revisionists,
especially of the foreign type, most of whom do not understand our narrative;
do not understand our pain and, therefore, cannot truly be expected to be
bothered with why Nigeria needs to continue to stand strong as one undivided
nation.
12.
One
of the critically misunderstood and misjudged part of our story as a nation
pertains to the place of the Aburi Accord and its failure to stop the Civil
War. For the avoidance of doubt, the Aburi Accord was meant to enable the
principal parties break the ice and to get back together as officers and
gentlemen, discuss and solve our problems in our homeland, at home, in our
land. The spirit of ‘The True Aburi Accord’ was ultimately encapsulated in
Decree No. 8 of 1967. The only addition outside the spirit of the Accord was my
insistence that a clause barring any part of Nigeria from seceding. This perhaps
was what made Ojukwu to reject the Decree. Otherwise what we agreed to in Aburi
was enshrined in that Dcree and we were to implement them to the letter, having
given Ojukwu almost all that he wanted. We did that in order to achieve peace
and return normalcy to Nigeria. Unfortunately, Ojukwu was the one to renege on
our agreement. Infact, he did not attend our meeting at NIFOR in Benin City.
13
Before
we left Ghana, we had our agreement that on return to Nigeria, I, as Nigeria’s
Head of State should make the first broadcast after which the other Reional
Governors would make theirs. Unfortunately, I was down with serious malaria
that I could not make my broadcast but Ojukwu went on air as soon as he got
back and claimed that we agreed to a Confederation to which I had always
strongly objected. That and other actions taken by him and his government made
us to carefully review the Aburi Agreement. I got the Secretary to the
government and some Nigerian Senior Civil Servants to review it. They did and
pointed out some serious ramifications of it. Those points were carefully
considered and taken into account in drafting the Decree No 8 mentioned
earlier. Whoever said that the Aburi Accord failed as a result of pressure
mounted on the Federal side (i.e. me and the Federal Government team) to
repudiate it was absolutely mistaken.
14.
But
the Civil War itself was a direct result of the Unilateral Declaration of
Independence (UDI) and secession of the Eastern Region from Nigeria. If there
was no secession, there would not have been civil war. Please, note and
remember that Ojukwu had taken a number of illegal actions against the country.
Among these were the hijacking of Nigeria Airways plane, the confiscation of
railways rolling stock, the annexation of branches of the Central Bank and Post
Offices in the Eastern Region as well as the approbation of Federal Revenue in
the Region. All these in order to buttress the secession. The secession, more
than anything else, left me with no other option than take “Police Action” that
was later upgraded to full “Military Action” after the Biafran Army ventured
into and overran the hitherto ‘neutral’ Mid-West Region. Even with the outbreak
of hostilities, we never referred to our Eastern compatriots as ‘enemy’ not
minding the fact that they used that and similar other terms e.g. ‘Northern
Vandals’ to describe the Nigerian side. The worst description we came up with
was to refer to them as ‘rebels’.
15.
This
was a deliberate action on our part, as we were determined to fight a humane
war, a war of unity with a view to bringing our brothers and sisters in the
East back to the mainstream of a united Nigerian nation. Our resolve at ensuring
that settlement or reconciliation should not be difficult to achieve was
underscored by the 11 point Code of Conduct that was given to every Nigerian
officers and men, soldiers who was made to understand the grave repercussions
for any breach of the Code. For ease of reference, the code of conduct is
reproduced as follows:
a.
Under
no circumstances must a pregnant woman be ill-treated or killed
b.
Children
will not be molested or killed. They will be protected and cared for.
c.
Youths
and school children must not be attacked unless they are engaged in open
hostility against the Federal Government Forces. They should be given all
protection and care. Hospitals, hospital staff and patients should not be
tampered with or molested.
d.
Soldiers
who surrender will not be killed. They are to be disarmed and treated as
Prisoners-of-war. They are entitled in all circumstances to humane treatment
and respect for their person and honour.
e.
No
property, building and so on will be destroyed maliciously. Churches and
mosques must not be desecrated.
f.
No
looting of any kind because a good soldier never loots.
g.
Women
will be protected against any attack on their person, honour, and in particular
against rape or any form of indecent assault.
h.
Male
civilians who are hostile to the Federal Forces are to be deal with firmly but
fairly. They must be humanely treated.
i.
All
military me and civilians wounded will be given necessary medical attention and
care. They must be respected and protected in all circumstances.
j.
Foreign
nationals on legitimate business will not be molested, but mercenaries will not
be spared. They are the worst enemies.
16.
No
matter how hard we tried to avoid it, lives were sadly, yet inevitably, lost in
the 30-month long war. In the end, however, the scale of casualties was limited
because we did not launch an all-out-war against identified ‘external’ enemies.
I will like to emphasise that our belief in a ‘united’ Nigeria is predicted on
the notion that no single identity group, society or community has all the
answers or resources to solve its immediate and even long-term needs, for which
reason it behoves all citizens to enrich themselves and the nation entity. We
deeply recognized the diversity in our cultural milieu and this became the
basis for our commitment to the concept of ‘Unity in Diversity’, which is not
peculiar to Nigeria but is a dimension of social engineering in several
societies of the world. Again, borrowing from a lecture I delivered at the
Nigerian Defence Academy, I will like to reiterate that:
“The concept of
‘national unity’ refers not just to the feeling or sense of oneness and
willingness to tolerate one another and the readiness to defend the country; it
also means the promotion and attainment of a national consciousness whereby
most members of the society understand and defend the principle that
‘difference’ enriches human interactions”.
17.
From
all indications, God and fortune was at work on behalf of our nation during
this trying period. Had it not been so, the harvest of deaths and the
destruction of property would not only have been mind-boggling/troubling but it
would have cause extreme bitterness that would have made post-war
reconciliation difficult, if not impossible. Even when it has been proved
beyond doubt that everything humanly possible was done by the Federal
Government to keep casualty figures at the barest minimum, not the propaganda
in millions of casualties. Our country, today, still grapples with pockets of
social, economic, political and cultural resentments carried over from the
Civil War era. Naturally, this observation keenly informed some of the policy
initiatives that I spearheaded in the post-war reconstruction of Nigeria.
NIGERIA
IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CIVIL WAR
18.
When,
mercifully, the Nigerian Civil War ended on 12 January and officially on 15,
January 197 with my acceptance of the instrument of surrender from Col. Philip
Effiong who then headed headed the rebel enclave in the absence of its de facto
leader, Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, who had earlier travelled out of his
territory in search of the peace, I knew that our nation’s proverbial journey
of a thousand miles was just about to commence. I knew that our first tentative
steps on that journey would count for much, not just among us Nigerians but in
the comity of nations. I was mindful that my place in history would be
determined by how well or badly we tackled the immediate challenges of a young
nation that had just emerged from the ravages of war. Let us not forget that
the officers and men who conducted the war on both sides of the divide were
young with average age range of between 27 and 36, hence it would have been
understandable if any rash decisions were taken in the heat of the moment.
19.
Again,
God was in control of our situation as a nation. He granted us the wisdom to be
magnanimous in victory. Consequently,
rather than bask in the euphoria of perceived victory, we chose to ravel down a
road never before travelled by any nation in the history of wars in the world.
We decided that there was no gain in accumulating the spoils of war. Instead,
we chose to face our most challenging task of achieving reconciliation,
national reintegration within the shortest possible time. That worldview made
it possible for us to quickly and deliberately administer healing balm to take
care of hurts and wounds. I underscored our philosophy of No Victor, No Vanquished
which I pronounced in my speech to the nation after we silenced the guns and
rolled up our sleeves as we set our hands on the plough to rebuild Nigeria. Our
search for solutions to the problems of the aftermath of war and destruction
made it imperative that we established a set of guiding principles as anchors for
our determined forward march. This was the basis of our introduction of the ‘3Rs’…Reconciliation,
(Reintegration) Rehabilitation and Reconstruction, which, we must, understand
did not just try to rapidly address issues of immediate socio-economic and
infrastructural concerns but vividly underpinned my vision of the future; a
vision of a greater, united Nigeria in which anyone, from the East, West, North
and South could aspire to success in any field of human endeavour.
20.
We
began our effort at self-purification by ensuring that our solution to the healing
process was home-grown. We devised our game plan without external help; we
rejected emergency assistance for help from nations that did not help our cause
at the time of our greatest need and we extended an olive branch, to hand of
reconciliation, especially African nations that hid under the cloak of
recognizing the rebellion. There were no reprisals against any group or
individuals just as soldiers quickly dropped their guns to render helping hands
to the civilian populace. Against all odds, Nigeria survived an uncommon
experience, we were able to resolve our problems and avoided foreign outside
interference, and has remained a reference point in the healing of post-war
trauma across the world.
21.
We
must not forget that the even geographical spread of infrastructural
development across Nigeria in the spirit of the 3Rs and the dictum of No
Victor, No Vanquished helped to assure the people that we meant business. We
were helped a great deal by the fact that no extensive damage was done to
infrastructural facilities in most part of the country throughout the period of
the war. What y administration succeeded in doing was the consolidation and
expansion of the nation’s infrastructural base by embarking on projects that
complement and improved on what was on ground. What this has meant is that
communities across the nation can only complain of not getting enough, not of
having been abandoned.
22.
In
order to further cement our commitment to the unity of Nigeria, my government
initiated the compulsory one-year National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) scheme. The
raison d’être for the founding of the NYSC is multifarious but the most
critical of the objectives was the cultural integration of our Youths, young
graduates who were posted to communities outside their home States to know
their country, to serve and help. Today, the result of this initiative is
apparent is apparent, for here is hardly any household in this country that is
in its purest form. Inter-ethnic marriages have created a new Nigeria that is a
lot more difficult to break-up without severing blood ties. Although the
circumstances and realities of modern day Nigeria have conspired to dilute the
essence of inaugurating the NYSC scheme, the spirit of the programme remains
alive and well. Contrary to the views being canvassed in certain quarters that
the NYSC has outlived its usefulness, I wish to submit that we take a closer
look at the philosophy that undergirds the programme.
23.
The
NYSC, it goes without saying, was not intended as a pool to provide cheap labour
for government and the private sector. No. on the contrary, the overriding goal
was and still remains to bring together the youth of our nation, and to know
their country better and in the process, achieve rapid transfer of cultural
values that easily allow young men and women who would shape the future of
Nigeria to bond and better appreciate the unity in our diversity. To the extent
that this perspective remains at the core of the programme, I am confident that
the NYSC scheme will forever remain a critical point for consideration in any
serious effort to keep Nigeria one. It is for this reason that every effort
must be made to preserve the scheme and buy more time for the survival of our
nation in the long haul.
NIGERIA
IN A DEMOCRATIC DISPENSATION
24.
The
democratic experience in Nigeria has been terminated and re-instituted at least
four times between 1966 and 1999. The quest for participatory democracy
encouraged successive administrations to try out all manner of political
permutations, including the Option A4 open ballot system by which voters lined
up to be counted behind their candidates. In spite of the twists and turns on
the political terrain, the resolve of the people to remain united in their
quest to emplace an enduring democracy towards the building of a new Nigeria
has stood the test of time. Bit by bit, we have seen the lever of power
shifting amongst the geo-political zones of the country. The pace of shift may
not have been as fast as many people would have been wanted that this has happened
qualifies to be recorded as some form of progress. In this regard, I was happy
to see an Igbo Officer rose to be Chief of Army Staff, Secretary General of the
Commonwealth, and Vice Chancellors of various Universities and so on.
25.
I
hope and am sure my brothers and sisters in the South-East will be a lot
happier when Ndigbo have the opportunity to attain the presidency of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria. This, to all intents and purposes, will help to
achieve some measure of closure on memories of the Civil War. I align with this
position and it is the reason for my support of the principle of rotation of
power in Nigeria. The net gain in this is that Nigeria will continue to
gradually shed toga of political instability and the dread of ethnic domination
that hitherto defined political and socio-cultural relationships in our
country. These gains notwithstanding, challenges will still remain, especially
as they relate to insecurity occasioned by the actions of insurgents and ethnic
militias.
26.
By
the grace of the Almighty God, I have now lived 80 fulfilling years into which
has been packed momentous events both in my personal life and in the life of
Nigeria. In all of these years, I have been fortunate to have had two prime
calls, one in war time Nigeria-to keep Nigeria ‘one’-and the other in peace
time-also to maintain the unity of Nigeria. Whilst the former call was
supported with guns and bullets; the later call is anchored not in involvement
in political pursuit, but on the word of God, as made manifest in Chronicles
7:14:
“If my people, which are called by my
name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face and turn from their
wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin, and will
heal their land.”
27.
This
exhortation, amongst several other factors, encouraged me, acting in concert
with several men and women of faith and goodwill, to inaugurate Nigeria Prays,
an inter-denominational and inter-faith group of which I am the convener and
Chairman. What we do basically, as can easily be deduced from the name, is to
pray for Nigeria in all its ramifications calling for peace and love of our
country and people. Since 1996 when the group was founded, we have held prayers
for the country in all 36 States of the country and in Abuja, the Federal
Capital Territory several times. We also have convened prayer sessions outside
the country, UK and USA, to intercede for our dear nation. I believe that our
prayers and the prayers of other lovers of this country are borne out of a deep
sense of patriotism and they have contributed to the relative peace and
stability of Nigeria. Looking back, perhaps, the process of healing Nigeria of
the wounds of the Civil War would have received tremendous boost if I had
invited Emeka Ojukwu to the Ministry, as I wrote in my condolence message to
his family:
“The
only regret I have is that I did not make an effort to draft Emeka into our
Nigeria Prays ministry to join me and many others in praying for Nigeria. Who
knows whether with his experience of the horrors of the civil war and the
powers of prayer we would not have sooner been saved the scourge of the
violence, bombing, kidnappings and mayhem being lately experienced in the
nation.”
28.
When
my ‘sparring partner’, Emeka, and I locked horns in the 1960s, we did not get
into that position because we wanted to pursue any self interest. We were
driven by our love of our people and our nation, which was something that we
had in common.
“ Ojukwu and I had one thing in common.
We were both principled men and it might even be said that the Civil War
resulted largely because we both struck to our principles. We swore an oath of
loyalty to our country, Nigeria. This was the ideal we both held before the
crises that engulfed the country in 1966-1967. I concede, in all honesty, that
Emeka Ojukwu could be justified in taking a stand for the defence and
protection of his people in the circumstances of the country at the time. I was
trying to do the same at the national level (that included them and his people)
at that time. I understand and respected his position but not the extreme
position he took which I felt was misguided. I wished we had toiled more to
avoid secession. I strongly believe that if Ojukwu was in my shoes, he would
have done exactly the same as I did during those crucial days. What was done
was not out of personal or group dislike or hatred. Emeka was never my enemy
nor are the Igbo. We never disliked each other. We only disliked the stand and
actions taken by the other.”
29.
The
upcoming elections on March 28 and April 11, 2015, present us with, perhaps,
the best opportunity yet to renew our hope for national rebirth through the
ballot box rather than through the muzzles of guns. Our goal, in the man,
should be to institute selfless leadership that takes the welfare of citizens
as Job number one. It goes without saying, therefore, that economically
emancipated and happy citizens will be all-too happy to complement the drive of
visionary leadership to build, one block after another, a Nigeria that will
stand tall in the comity of nations. But we cannot achieve this if we fail to
vote our conscience and do so in an atmosphere that is devoid of violence,
which can only drive us further apart. As history has proved, no nation has ever
survived two civil wars; hence, the saying that is better to ‘jaw-jaw than to
war-war’. It is only when we recognise and conform to this viewpoint that we
can secure the future of our nation and speak loud enough for all to hear that
Nigeria will not, as predicted, break up in 2015 or in any other year for that
matter. I am that confident in the survival of Nigeria as a nation and that,
precisely, was the reason I was prepared to lay down my life to defend my
country. As it is said, what is not worth dying is not worth living for. A
number of our compatriots paid the supreme price to uphold this same believe.
We can only pray that God will continue to grant their patriotic souls eternal
repose.
CONCLUSION
30.
I
believe it is important that I end this presentation by once more acknowledging
the honour done my late friend, Emeka, with the name change of this university.
There is little doubt that this gesture will not build his reputation amongst
the intelligentsia (with whom he was truly comfortable), it will also cover
every other member of the larger ‘Odumegwu-Ojukwu’ family whose lineage have
given prominence to the geographical space now known as Anambra State.
31.
I
wish to commend the Vice-Chancellor, the Governing Council, staff and students
of the Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University as well as member of the
organizing committee of this year’s convocation for a job very well done. And
to all graduating students, I wish you what I was wished as I graduated from
the Royal Sandhurst Military Academy: ‘happy hunting’.
32.
I
thank you, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, for your kind attention. God
bles you all.
Signed:
General
Dr. Yakubu Gowon, GCFR.
Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu Ojukwu University,
Uli,
Igbariam Campus
Anambra
State.
Wednesday,
25 March, 2015.
Gowon visited Anambra and spoke for over 4 hours: This is what he said unedited
Reviewed by Unknown
on
Friday, April 10, 2015
Rating:
No comments: