Military authorities have retired
the former General Officer commanding the 7 Division of the Nigerian Army,
Maiduguri, Maj. Gen. Abubakar Mohammed.
Investigations by
odogwuemekaodogwu.blogspot.com revealed this on Tuesday just as the
Nigeria Labour Congress, the Trade Union Congress and human rights
lawyers pleaded for the pardon of 12 soldiers who were sentenced to death by a
military court on Monday.
The soldiers, who had on May 14,
2014 fired shots at Mohammed, in Maiduguri, were convicted for mutiny and other
offences such as insubordination.
Investigations revealed that Mohammed was retired after he was recalled to the Headquarters of the Nigerian Army without posting for months after the soldiers’ attempt on his life. It was gathered from a top military source in Abuja that the Army authorities quietly retired him last month.
The source said:
Investigations revealed that Mohammed was retired after he was recalled to the Headquarters of the Nigerian Army without posting for months after the soldiers’ attempt on his life. It was gathered from a top military source in Abuja that the Army authorities quietly retired him last month.
The source said:
“The Maj. Gen. has been retired; you
don’t expect that to be made public; issues of retirement especially in the
military are confidential. The man was at the Army headquarters for some time.
He was awaiting posting then but he was eventually retired about a
month ago.”
Meanwhile, the NLC,
TUC and human rights lawyers have urged the Presidency and the Army
Council chaired by the Minister of Defence to prevail on the military
authorities to spare the lives of the 12 soldiers.
The lawyers are 3 Senior Advocates of Nigeria
– Olisa Agbakoba, Femi Falana and Sebastian Hon – as well as Fred
Agbaje and Monday Ubani.
In fact, Agbakoba, who flayed the judgment threatened to go to court to seek justice for the convicts.
He said that the process through which the court martial passed the sentences on the soldiers was unconstitutional. The SAN, who maintained that the composition of the court violated the principle of natural justice, said he had asked his lawyers to approach the convicts for the purpose of lodging an appeal against the military authorities.
Falana said the soldiers were erroneously charged as Mohammed whose car was shot at by the soldiers was not killed.
In fact, Agbakoba, who flayed the judgment threatened to go to court to seek justice for the convicts.
He said that the process through which the court martial passed the sentences on the soldiers was unconstitutional. The SAN, who maintained that the composition of the court violated the principle of natural justice, said he had asked his lawyers to approach the convicts for the purpose of lodging an appeal against the military authorities.
Falana said the soldiers were erroneously charged as Mohammed whose car was shot at by the soldiers was not killed.
“The soldiers were charged with
attempted murder which does not attract death penalty. In the circumstance, the
12 convicts should have been charged under Section 52(2) of the Armed Forces
Act which provides for life imprisonment.
Before the incident, the soldiers at the Maimalari
Cantonment had complained of insufficient ammunition, food and allowances.
The visit of the GOC
was said to have coincided with the arrival of the corpses of soldiers killed
in an ambush in Chibok, Borno State on the night of May 13, 2014. It was the
tragic situation which reportedly infuriated the soldiers. Having investigated and
confirmed the circumstances which led to the mutiny in question, the military
authorities removed the GOC.
In the light of the foregoing, I urge the Army Council not
to confirm the death sentences passed on the 12 soldiers but commute same to
imprisonment in the interest of Justice. The facts and circumstance of the
mutinous act of the convicted soldiers should be taken into
consideration.
However, if the death sentence of the Maiduguri 12 is
confirmed by the Army Council, the convicted soldiers are advised to take the
case to the Court of Appeal which is likely to follow its decision in the case
of Yussuf & 21 Ors v Nigerian Army (2003) 36 WRN 68 wherein the sentence of
life imprisonment passed on the appellants who had rioted at the Cairo Airport
in Egypt was quashed.”
This is coming as a
message to elombah.com from a group called Due Process Advocates, and
titled WE MUST FIGHT TO SAVE THE LIVES OF THE 12 SOLDIERS SENTENCED TO DIE BY
FIRIGN SQUAD, DPA stated "we take human life seriously. The state
cannot officially take life without due process and without full rigour and
diligence towards exculpation. Yes, Nigeria has over 160 million people. But
that does not mean that we should allow the hair of any man to be taken away
without justice, mercy or consideration of humanism. The question is: what will
Nigeria benefit from the killing of these 12 soldiers? Nothing!"
The statement
signed by leader of the group, Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire further stated:
"It will not
increase discipline in an undisciplined and highly corrupt and politicized
military. It would rather sow the seed of rancour and disunity at a time
Nigeria is going through a real existential threat. If the officers have
committed an offence, time is now for us to improve our method of punishment.
Death by firing squad is too atavistic to be acceptable to a civilised mind.
"Until
Nigeria begins to punish the top officers who embezzle the security allocations
and send our men to fight dangerous terrorists with outdated weapons and
equipment, it will remain unjust to punish those poor fellows with death by
firing squad. Discipline them, we must, if they have done anything wrong. But
killing them has no disciplinary logic to it. I oppose this sentence of death
by firing square. I oppose it with every drop of blood in me. Firing squads are
a horrible part of the Nigeria history, which we should be eager to eradicate
and wipe out of our psyche.
"On this
basis, I have decided to enter my appearance as counsel either for these
officers or at least in the capacity of a friend of the court. I shall use that
position to advocate for justice, due process, and clemency if necessary. I
want to challenge Nigeria. It must live up the standards of human civilization
and it must stop all forms of scapegoatism and sacrificial tokenisms that could
only be the purpose of killing these men.
"I call on
all members of DPA, who have information about these officers, where they are
detained and any other information that would enable me file my papers in court
within this weeks, to please help provide me with information. I call on our
members to brace themselves for this fight. We shall fight for justice. We
shall fight for human life and not fold our arms as more people are
slaughtered."
Investigations
revealed that the GOC, Mohammed was retired after he was recalled to the
Headquarters of the Nigerian Army without posting for months after the
soldiers’ attempt on his life.
It was gathered
from a top military source in Abuja that the Army authorities quietly retired
him last month.
The source said,
“The Maj. Gen. has been retired; you don’t expect that to be made public;
issues of retirement especially in the military are confidential. The man was
at the Army headquarters for some time. He was awaiting posting then but
he was eventually retired about a month ago.”
Meanwhile, the
NLC, TUC and human rights lawyers have urged the Presidency and the Army
Council chaired by the Minister of Defence to prevail on the military
authorities to spare the lives of the 12 soldiers.
The lawyers are
three Senior Advocates of Nigeria–Olisa Agbakoba, Femi
Falana and Sebastian Hon – as well as Fred Agbaje and Monday Ubani.
In fact, Agbakoba,
who flayed the judgment threatened to go to court to seek justice for the
convicts.
He said that the
process through which the court martial passed the sentences on the soldiers
was unconstitutional.
The SAN, who
maintained that the composition of the court violated the principle of
natural justice, said he had asked his lawyers to approach the
convicts for the purpose of lodging an appeal against the military authorities.
He said, “The
court martial system is totally unconstitutional. They (soldiers) have the
right to go to court and appeal the judgment. Actually, I have asked my lawyers
to approach them and afford them our services to lodge an appeal.”
Agbakoba submitted
that the offence for which the soldiers were tried and found guilty was
undefined. He stated that Section 38(12) of the 1999 Constitution
stipulated that all offences must be defined.
He said,“I have
represented a number of soldiers at court martial. In particular, I represented
Gen. JOJ Okulagu and my point at the court martial was that a process
that allows the commander to appoint the investigator, the court martial
president, members and the judge advocate is clearly contrary to all principles
of natural justice.
“The basis of
justice is that everybody who has the power to decide has a duty to act fairly.
Without prejudice to the offence, whether the person is guilty or not, he is
entitled to a fair trial.
“The Army Act that
defines the work for the court martial system is unconstitutional because the
basic offence contained in the Army Act is that you are charged for an offence
said to be prejudicial to service discipline.
“That is what the
law says–conduct prejudicial to service discipline. But conduct prejudicial to
service discipline is an undefined offence contrary to Section 38(12) of the
Constitution and the court has said that offences must be defined.”
Army Fires Major General Whose Boys Were Involved In Mutiny
Reviewed by Unknown
on
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Rating:

No comments: